The following is a picture of my favorite place to go to think in Vermont
In response to the "originality or newness" of stories:
I don't think there is a story that is going to be an original event of the human experience that we haven't seen in literature before. People have been around for quite some time and I think we have experienced most things that we can experience. Loss, love, death, war, dealing with new technologies, all of these have been discussed, written, debated and rewritten in different ways. There are certain ways to change the actual expression of that writing. A writer can tell a story about a breakup in a way you have never seen words presented before. But it is still a story about a breakup, which you have probably read a hundred times in other forms.
Maybe there will be the scientific discovery of a new emotion that can cause the boom of an entirely new literary genre. An original story, born from the discovery of a new psychological experience. This sounds like science fiction, and maybe it is. I have trouble with sci-fi personally because a) it frightens me (not the "eww an alien!" way, in a "wow if someone invented a robot like that we would actually be DONE" way) and b) because the best sellers are frequently (in my experience) poorly written. Again, I digress. I think that innovation in writing style can make an old story feel like new again, I really do. However, I think humans have pretty much hit on the gamut of emotion and experience as far as literature is concerned, and it is my belief that stories are about people, even if they appear to be about animals or aliens or specks of dirt.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.