Hemingway’s decision to describe the price each of Jake’s meals and drinks is at first distinctly irritating. At around the fifth bottle of champagne, the
reader feels that they get the point: Jake and company are raging alcoholics
and connoisseurs of expensive hors d’oeuvres.
However, this repetition and endless
attention to seemingly insignificant detail is in fact a key way of describing
Jake’s detachment from the other characters and their lack of real friendship
towards him.
It is almost always Jake who gets
and pays for food, which shows his role as the put-upon caretaker of the
group. (I believe that the only times
that someone else in the group pays is when they draw lots.) When people are feeling worried, he is the
one to offer them a drink, and when people need food, he is usually the one who
gets it. For example, on the train to
Spain, Jake is the one who finds out about the pilgrims taking up all the
dining times and, when he tells Bill, Bill says, “‘Give him ten francs.’”
(85) Rather than offering Jake the money,
Bill simply tells Jake to pay as usual.
In fact, when Jake does so and the waiter only offers them sandwiches,
Bill indignantly snaps, “‘I suppose if I’d
given you five francs you would have advised us to jump off the train’” (85,
emphasis added). Bill’s claim of Jake’s
money as his in some way, somehow deserved by him, epitomizes the rather
leechish attitude of the party towards Jake.
This attitude comes as a stark contrast to the generosity of the
Spanish; again and again, Jake tries to pay his bill but is instead given his alcohol
or food for free. The people doing so
have no ulterior motive for doing so; they are people “that [Jake] had never
seen before” (157) and would never see again.
Hemingway makes it clear that Jake distinctly notices the amount of
their generosity by having him remember the specific prices of what they bought
for him. Usually the amounts are small,
but all together they are a significant amount of money saved by the kindness
of others. This memory, presented in contrast to Jake’s
group’s lack of regard for his money, presents the reader with a clearer sense
of Jake’s relation with the people he’s with and his evolving attitude towards
them.
Did I say “evolving attitude”? Yes, I did, and I am going to tackle a little
bit of the question of whether or not Jake changes. While he may not undergo a seismic change in
values or morals, he does become disillusioned with his group, particularly
Brett. By the end of the novel, he has
recognized his “friends” for who they are.
Although this is never acknowledged directly, Jake repeatedly refers to
making the waiters his friends by tipping them lavishly, ironically commenting
that “if they remembered me their friendship would be loyal” (233). This similarity with the constant need to pay
for Mike, Bill, Cohn, and Brett is particularly reinforced by the fact that his
last interaction with Mike is centered around being told that “‘You can pay for
the car, Jake’” (231). Hemingway has
made the parallel just clear enough that the reader can see the shift in Jake’s
view of his friends, although perhaps not so clear that Jake is conscious of
this change in attitude. The reader is
still reminded of this parallel between waiters and false friends when Jake
pays for the food, alcohol, and car for Brett, making his later bitter
dismissal of Brett as someone who he will “send…off with one man. Introduce her to another to go off with
him. Now go and bring her back” (239)
make sense. The final line “‘Isn’t it pretty to think so?’”
(247) indicates that Jake has realized the same thing that the reader has; his
relationship with Brett, and indeed all his compatriots, has little
substance. It is just something nice to
imagine, just like his “friendship” with the waiters, and devoid of the genuine
generosity found in the Spanish.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.